<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>inquisity &#187; apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inquisity.com/tag/apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inquisity.com</link>
	<description>(n.) the endless pursuit to understand the nature of things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 04:24:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>When design overtakes functionality &#8211; new iPod shuffle a blunder</title>
		<link>http://www.inquisity.com/2009/04/15/when-design-overtakes-functionality-new-ipod-shuffle-a-blunder/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inquisity.com/2009/04/15/when-design-overtakes-functionality-new-ipod-shuffle-a-blunder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod shuffle headphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new ipod shuffle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inquisity.com/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Usually engineers win out in a battle with the design folks.  Apparently this time it&#8217;s the other way around for the new version of the iPod Shuffle:
The decision to put the controls on the headphones means that unless Apple opens up the controls to third parties, you can’t even play music on the iPod without [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Usually engineers win out in a battle with the design folks.  Apparently this time it&#8217;s the other way around for the <a href="http://www.apple.com/ipodshuffle/">new version</a> of the iPod Shuffle:</p>
<blockquote><p>The decision to put the controls on the headphones means that unless Apple opens up the controls to third parties, you can’t even <em>play</em> music on the iPod without using Apple’s own earbuds. What happens if, as is also not unheard of, Apple&#8217;s stock earbuds break? Your iPod is completely useless until you get another pair of approved headphones. (<a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/139333/2009/03/ipod_shuffle_design.html">full article</a>)</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.inquisity.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/ipodshuffle_image1_200903111.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-65 aligncenter" title="ipodshuffle_image1_200903111" src="http://www.inquisity.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/ipodshuffle_image1_200903111-300x254.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="254" /></a></p>
<p>Like many people, the regular Apple headphones don&#8217;t stay in my ears if I&#8217;m doing anything other than sitting down, so I have a different pair for when I work out.  This makes the new generation of Shuffles worthless to me (and many others).  Needless to say I will be buying the previous generation.</p>
<p>I bet that Apple: a) opens up the design specs so other companies can make compliant headphones, and/or b) has buttons on the actual unit in the next generation of Shuffles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inquisity.com/2009/04/15/when-design-overtakes-functionality-new-ipod-shuffle-a-blunder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
